Editorial and Technical Review Policy

The colour and display technology pages on this site make factual claims , about how LCD and OLED panels behave, what a dead or stuck pixel looks like, what backlight bleed is. This page explains how that content is handled.

How claims are checked

Technical explanations are written to match how the relevant display technology actually behaves, cross checked against publicly available documentation from browser vendors and standards bodies where a claim depends on how a browser or web API behaves, and revised when they turn out to be incomplete or overstated. Where a claim is genuinely disputed or depends on a specific panel or device, the content says so rather than picking a side.

What gets corrected quickly

An absolute statement that turns out to have a common exception , for instance, describing all displays as behaving identically when LCD and OLED panels behave differently in an important way , is treated as an error to fix, not a simplification to leave in place. If you spot one, the Contact page is the way to report it.

Where the line is drawn

• Diagnostic content stays diagnostic. Pages that help you look at your own screen (the colour and pixel test pages) describe what to look for and what it might mean, without claiming to replace a manufacturer’s own diagnostic tools.
• Simulated content is always labelled as simulated. Every prank and fake OS page states plainly that it is a visual simulation and does not affect your device , see Terms of Use.
• No fabricated authority. This site does not attribute content to named experts, cite studies that were not actually consulted, or claim professional credentials it does not have.

This policy describes an ongoing practice rather than a one time audit, and it is updated as the site’s content is.